Results: 13

    Examining the role of coaching in health-system transformations

    OHTs are being introduced to provide a new way of organizing and delivering care that is more integrated from the perspective of the patients in their local communities, and that achieves measurable improvements in key quadruple-aim metrics of improving care experiences and health outcomes at manageable ...

    Creating rapid-learning health systems in Canada

    The 14 jurisdictions include one federal/national/panCanadian jurisdiction, 10 provincial jurisdictions, and three territorial jurisdictions. The first of these jurisdictions includes both areas of federal government responsibility for providing healthcare – most notably for Indigenous peoples, militar...

    Creating a rapid-learning health system in Ontario

    Ontario has both a health system and a research system that are increasingly putting patients and rapid learning and improvement at their centre. For the health system, a recent notable example of such efforts was the Patients First Act 2016 which, among other things, mandated the creation of Patient and...

    Fostering an organizational culture supportive of evidence-informed policymaking

    We identified a total of 21 relevant documents by searching Health Systems Evidence and running targeted searches in PubMed, with the search strategy for these databases detailed in Box 2. A document was included when it directly addressed the question posed for this rapid synthesis (i.e., it was specifi...

    Outils du projet SUPPORT pour l´élaboration des politiques de santé éclairées par les données probantes 14: organisation et utilisation de dialogues sur les politiques à l´appui de l´élaboration de politiques éclairées par les données probantes
    SUPPORT Toolkit for Evidence-Informed Health Policy Development 14: Organizing and Using Policy Dialogues to Support Evidence-Informed Policy Development

    Les dialogues sur les politiques permettent dexaminer les données de recherche parallèlement aux perspectives, aux expériences et aux connaissances tacites des personnes qui participent à la prise de décisions relatives à une question hautement prioritaire, ou qui sont touchées par de telles déci...

    SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 7: finding systematic reviews

    This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. Systematic reviews are increasingly seen as a key source of information in policymaking, particularly in terms of assisting with descr...

    SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health (STP) 6: using research evidence to address how an option will be implemented

    This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. After a policy decision has been made, the next key challenge is transforming this stated policy position into practical actions. What...

    Issue brief: Engaging Civil Society in Supporting Research Use in Health Systems

    While the term “civil society” is in widespread use in many countries, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, in some countries (such as Canada) the terms “voluntary organization,” “non-governmental organization,” and “advocacy group” are much more commonly used.(1) The term ...

    STP: Herramientas SUPPORT para la toma de decisiones en políticas de salud informada por la evidencia 8: cómo decidir qué tanta confianza depositar en una revisión sistemática
    STP: SUPPORT tools for decision-making in health policies informed by evidence 8: how to decide how much confidence to place in a systematic review

    La confiabilidad de las revisiones sistemáticas en cuanto a los efectos de las intervenciones sanitarias es variable. En consecuencia, los responsables de la toma de decisiones en políticas y las demás personas necesitan evaluar qué tanta confianza puede depositarse en dicha evidencia. El uso de proc...

    Ferramentas SUPPORT para a elaboração de políticas de saúde baseadas em evidências (STP) 10: como considerar a equidade ao avaliar os resultados de uma revisão sistemática?
    SUPPORT tools for evidence-based health policy making (STP) 10: How to consider equity when evaluating the results of a systematic review?

    Neste artigo abordaremos considerações sobre equidade. Desigualdades podem ser definidas como ?diferenças em saúde que são tanto desnecessárias e evitáveis quanto consideradas injustas e indevidas?. Fato este devidamente documentado em relação a fatores econômicos e sociais. As políticas ou pr...